Why Trust Us

What Sets Metriqly Apart

• Metrology‑grade methods: We use traceable references, quantify uncertainty, and validate with MSA/GR&R.
• Field proof: Every lab result is challenged under real conditions—dust, glare, vibration, temperature swings, coolant, and glove use.
• Transparency: We publish protocols, disclose limitations, and separate funding from conclusions.

Who’s Doing the Testing

Our contributors are practitioners first: a lead metrologist, master machinist, licensed electrician, HVAC/controls tech, carpenter/GC, QA/QMS lead, and a data engineer. Together they design rigs, build uncertainty budgets, and test whether a tool remains truthful when conditions get messy.

How We Build Trust

• Standards‑first reviews: Recommendations are tied to tolerance, environment, and workflow—not hype.
• Reproducibility: You can follow our steps and expect similar results. If you can’t, tell us—replication matters.
• Vendor independence: We do not sell rankings and disclose any material relationships.

What We Won’t Do

We won’t cherry‑pick, hide uncertainty, or let sponsorships sway outcomes. If a tool fails, we say so plainly and explain how and why.

Your Role

Challenge us. Ask for data summaries. Suggest edge cases. The more our work is tested by the community, the more confidence everyone can have in the choices they make.